Scale. Optimize. Succeed.

Home  ›  Resources  ›  Glossary  ›  ROAS

What Is ROAS? Return on Ad Spend Explained

DEFINITION

Return on ad spend is the revenue attributed to advertising divided by the cost of that advertising. It is expressed as a ratio or a multiple: a ROAS of 4 means four units of attributed revenue for every one spent.

ROAS is the most quoted number in eCommerce advertising and one of the easiest to misread. It says nothing about margin, nothing about whether the sale would have happened anyway, and when it is summed across platforms it routinely claims more revenue than the business actually took.

Hands working through margin calculations with charts and a calculator

ROAS becomes useful the moment you know what your break-even figure is.

How ROAS is calculated

One division, and three decisions hidden inside it.

FORMULA

ROAS = Revenue from advertising ÷ Advertising cost

Revenue from advertising

Attributed revenue, which means the figure depends entirely on your attribution model. Last-click, data-driven and platform-reported figures will all give you a different answer from the same week of trading.

Advertising cost

Media spend at minimum. If you want the number to inform a decision rather than to report an activity, include agency fees, tools and creative production too.

The result

A ratio, not a margin and not a profit. A ROAS of 4 is excellent on a 60% contribution margin and loss-making on a 20% one.

ROAS is sometimes written as a percentage. A ROAS of 4 and a ROAS of 400% are the same number.

The same ROAS, two different outcomes

Two channels, identical ROAS, and only one of them is making money. The difference is contribution margin.

Line

Channel A

Channel B

Attributed revenue

40,000

40,000

Ad spend

10,000

10,000

ROAS

4.0

4.0

Cost of goods (of revenue)

45%

68%

Fulfilment and payment costs

4,800

6,400

Returns

2,000

4,800

Contribution after ad spend

+5,200

−8,400

Verdict on the same ROAS

Profitable

Loss-making

Illustrative figures chosen to make the arithmetic visible, not a benchmark. The point is that ROAS alone cannot distinguish these two channels.

Break-even ROAS

This is the figure to calculate before you set any ROAS target. It comes from your own margin, not from an industry article.

FORMULA

Break-even ROAS = 1 ÷ Contribution margin

At 35% contribution margin

Break-even ROAS is about 2.9. Below that, every additional pound of spend costs you money, however good the campaign looks in the platform.

At 20% contribution margin

Break-even ROAS is 5.0. A ROAS of 4 that another brand celebrates would be steadily losing you money.

At 60% contribution margin

Break-even ROAS is about 1.7, which is why high-margin categories can outbid everybody else and still profit.

Contribution margin here means after cost of goods, fulfilment, payment fees and returns — not gross margin. Using gross margin produces a break-even figure that is comfortably too low.

What ROAS does and does not tell you

Four things worth holding in mind every time the number is quoted in a meeting.

It ignores margin entirely

Platform figures double-count

It says nothing about incrementality

It trades off against volume

The question is almost never what our ROAS is. It is whether the last pound spent produced more than a pound of contribution.

Three ways ROAS gets misread

Each of these appears in accounts we take over more often than not.

Adding platform ROAS together

Three platforms each reporting a 4.0 ROAS do not combine into a 4.0 blended ROAS. They are each claiming overlapping conversions, and the sum of their reported revenue frequently exceeds what the business actually took.

Setting a target from an industry article

A published ROAS benchmark averages businesses with different margins, price points and categories. Your break-even ROAS is a property of your own margin structure and takes two minutes to calculate.

Optimising ROAS instead of contribution

The easiest way to raise ROAS is to spend only on branded search and retargeting. It produces a beautiful report and a shrinking business, because the spend that creates new demand is the spend that looks worst.

Our article on why ROAS reports hide margin problems works through all three with the arithmetic.

Terms that travel with this one

ROAS only makes sense alongside these.

The Amazon equivalent, expressed as a cost percentage rather than a revenue multiple. ACoS and ROAS are reciprocals of each other.

MER

Marketing efficiency ratio: total revenue divided by total marketing spend. The blended figure that cannot double-count across platforms.

Contribution margin

What remains from net revenue after goods, fulfilment and marketing. The number your break-even ROAS is calculated from.

CAC

Customer acquisition cost. ROAS per order, viewed from the cost side rather than the revenue side.

Incrementality

Whether advertising produced sales that would not otherwise have happened. The question ROAS cannot answer.

Revenue per order. Raising it raises ROAS at constant spend, which is why it is the least painful lever available.

ROAS FAQs

The questions we are asked most often about this number.

There is no universal answer, and any article giving you one is averaging businesses that have nothing in common. A good ROAS is comfortably above your break-even ROAS, which is one divided by your contribution margin. At 35% contribution margin, break-even is about 2.9; at 20% it is 5.0.

Divide one by your contribution margin expressed as a decimal. Contribution margin means net revenue after cost of goods, fulfilment, payment fees and returns — not gross margin, which produces a break-even figure that is too low and a target that quietly loses money.

They are the same relationship inverted. ROAS is revenue divided by spend; ACoS is spend divided by revenue, expressed as a percentage. A ROAS of 4 is an ACoS of 25%. Amazon uses ACoS; most other platforms use ROAS.

Because each platform claims credit for conversions it can see, and several platforms can see the same conversion. Summed platform-reported revenue often exceeds what the business actually took. Blended ROAS, calculated from your real revenue and total spend, cannot have this problem.

If you want the number to inform a decision, yes. Media spend alone understates what customer acquisition actually costs, sometimes by a third or more once agency, tooling and creative production are counted. Keep media-only ROAS for campaign optimisation.

Not necessarily. Accounts with exceptional ROAS are often spending almost entirely on branded search and retargeting, which reaches people who were already going to buy. The report looks excellent and the business stops growing.

It raises reported ROAS and lowers contribution margin at the same time, which also raises your break-even ROAS. A promotion can improve the ROAS number while making the campaign less profitable than it was before.

Yes, and it is part of the free eCommerce audit. It requires your cost of goods, fulfilment costs and returns rate, and it usually takes longer to gather the numbers than to do the arithmetic.

Do you know your break-even ROAS?

Most brands we speak to do not, which means their targets were set by convention rather than by arithmetic. A free eCommerce audit calculates it from your own margin and tells you what your current spend is really returning.