Scale. Optimize. Succeed.

Home  ›  Resources  ›  Templates  ›  Google Shopping Campaign Template

Google Shopping Campaign Template

Restructuring a live Shopping account costs you the learning period twice, so the cheapest place to change your mind about campaign structure is a spreadsheet. This one holds the six structures worth considering, what each one costs you, and a build sheet you complete before anything is created in the account.

FORMAT

XLSX

CONTAINS

4 tabs

LAST UPDATED

September 2026

LICENCE

Free, unrestricted

Flat lay of consumer products and packaging representing an eCommerce product catalogue

Every structure decision is a decision about what you will be able to see later.

The structure decision is made once and paid for repeatedly

Most Shopping accounts are structured around a theory nobody present can still explain.

Workspace with a laptop, camera and product materials used to prepare catalogue data

Shopping is the one channel where the ad is your catalogue data and the campaign is a budget instruction.

Campaign structure decides what you can see and what you can control. A single campaign covering the whole catalogue will spend the same acquiring a customer for a product at 60 per cent margin as one at 8 per cent, and no amount of bid management inside that campaign can fix it, because the campaign is the unit of budget.

The opposite failure is splitting on everything, which divides conversion data so thinly that automated bidding never leaves the learning period. One rule resolves both: split on anything you would budget differently, and nothing else.

It covers both Performance Max and Standard Shopping, because most accounts run both and the interesting question is which one you expect to win the auction.

Four tabs

Small on purpose. A build sheet nobody finishes is worse than no build sheet.

Read me

The five-step order for filling it in, and five counters that read the Build tab and tell you what is not ready yet.

Build

Eleven columns per campaign, pre-filled with a worked eight-campaign structure covering margin tiers, manual control and a second market.

Structures

Six structures with how each one splits, when to use it, and what it costs you. The last column is the one most comparisons leave out.

Naming

A four-segment naming convention with worked examples, and the five negative lists to build as shared lists before launch.

Nothing in the file is locked or protected. If a structure does not suit your catalogue, change it.

What each one costs you

Every structure buys control and pays for it in data density. The last column is the part most comparisons leave out.

Structure

How it splits

Use it when

What it costs you

Single campaign

One Performance Max campaign, all products

You are starting out, or the catalogue has similar margin throughout and fewer than about two hundred products

No control. You cannot spend differently on products that earn differently, and you cannot see which half is working.

By margin tier

Three or four campaigns split on a custom label carrying the margin band

Margin varies meaningfully across the catalogue, which on most stores it does

You have to maintain the custom label. If the margin data is wrong, the entire structure is wrong.

By category

One campaign per category or department

Categories have genuinely different customers, seasonality or buying cycles

Thinner conversion data per campaign. Small categories may never leave the learning period.

Bestsellers separated

One campaign for the products that carry revenue, one for the rest

A small number of products produce most of the sales, which is usual

Needs reviewing quarterly. This year bestsellers are not next year bestsellers.

Priority ladder

Three Standard Shopping campaigns at High, Medium and Low priority, steered by negatives

You want explicit control over which query buys which product, and somebody to run it

Labour, and a person who understands how priority and negatives interact. It works; it is not free.

By market

One campaign per country or currency

Delivery cost, margin or competitive intensity differs by market

More campaigns, thinner data. Only split markets you would genuinely budget separately.

The rule underneath all six: split on anything you would budget differently, and on nothing else.

From blank sheet to built account

Half a day for the planning, which is considerably less than a fortnight of relearning.

01

Work out your margin bands before anything else

Most of the structures on the Structures tab split on margin, and none of them work if the margin data is guessed. Landed cost, not invoice cost, and returns taken out. The break-even ROAS calculator turns each band into the target you will actually enter.

02

Pick one structure and write down why

The Structures tab states what each one costs you. Choose against your catalogue rather than against what worked on somebody else. Put the reason in the sheet, because in six months nobody will remember it.

03

Agree the naming convention before you type a campaign name

Four segments: type, market, intent, detail. Renaming later keeps the history in Google Ads and breaks every saved report and dashboard that referenced the old name.

04

Fill the Build tab and check the counters

Eleven columns per campaign. A campaign with no target and no negative list applied is not ready, and the Read me tab counts both for you.

05

Create the shared negative lists first

Five lists, built at account level so there is one place to edit them. Brand exclusion is the one that matters most, because without it you cannot separate acquisition from defence afterwards.

06

Build it, then leave it alone long enough to learn

Decide the review window before launch, not after the first bad week. Editing targets during the learning period restarts it, and an account edited weekly never produces data worth reading.

If you are restructuring rather than building new, change the structure once. Doing it in stages costs you the learning period at every stage.

Six structural mistakes

All six are cheap to avoid on a spreadsheet and expensive to fix in a live account.

One campaign for the whole catalogue

The campaign is the unit of budget, so a single campaign spends the same on a 60 per cent margin product and an 8 per cent one. No bid adjustment inside it can fix that.

Splitting on everything

The opposite failure. Twenty campaigns across a catalogue that converts forty times a month means no campaign ever leaves the learning period.

Leaving brand inside acquisition

Brand converts at rates acquisition cannot approach. Mixed together, the average describes neither, and the account looks healthier than it is.

Naming campaigns as you go

Three months later nobody can filter the account. Renaming keeps the history in Google Ads and breaks every report built on the old names.

Setting targets before knowing break-even

A target ROAS chosen because it sounds ambitious is a decision to buy revenue at an unknown margin. Break-even ROAS is one divided by gross margin, after returns.

Restructuring in stages

Each stage resets learning. If the structure is wrong, change it once, accept a fortnight of noise, and then read the data.

If more than two of these apply, plan the whole structure on the Build tab before changing anything in the account.

DOWNLOAD

Google Shopping Campaign Template — XLSX

Six structure options with the trade-off stated for each, a build sheet pre-filled with a worked margin-tier structure, a four-segment naming convention, five negative lists to create first, and five checks that tell you whether a campaign is ready to build.

FORMAT

XLSX spreadsheet

TABS

Read me, Build, Structures, Naming

STRUCTURES

6, with trade-offs

LICENCE

Free, commercial use

No email address, no sign-up and no watermark. Eight worked example rows sit at the top of the Build tab and should be deleted before you start.

Shopping campaign structure FAQs

What people ask before rebuilding an account.

There is no single best one, and the honest answer is a rule rather than a structure: split on anything you would budget differently, and on nothing else. For most stores that means margin tiers, because margin is the thing that actually varies and the thing that decides what you can afford to pay for a customer.

Performance Max for most of the catalogue, with brand excluded so you can measure it. Standard Shopping where you want explicit control over which query buys which product, or where you are judging a campaign on units rather than return, such as clearance. Running both is normal.

As few as your budget decisions require. A useful test: if you would never move money between two campaigns, they should probably be one. Splitting divides the conversion data automated bidding needs, and thin campaigns never leave the learning period.

Only if you want manual control and have somebody to run it. It is a Standard Shopping technique using High, Medium and Low priority with negatives to steer traffic, and it still works. It is labour, not magic, and most accounts do better putting that labour into the feed.

Get the margin data first. Landed cost rather than invoice cost, with returns taken out. Until then any structure you build is guessing, and so is every target in it.

Because it is the only filter you get. Campaign names are what you segment reports by, and renaming later keeps the history inside Google Ads while breaking every saved report, dashboard and filter built on the old names.

Two to four weeks on most eCommerce accounts, and decide the window before you launch rather than after the first bad week. Changing targets during the learning period restarts it.

No, and if you only have time for one, do the feed. In Shopping the feed is the ad; campaign structure is a budget instruction. The feed optimisation guide covers the other half.

Planned the structure and want it checked?

The free audit covers the account and the feed with the specialists who manage eCommerce paid media daily, plus five other disciplines, ranked into one constraint.

Free account

Get the eCommerce benchmarks other agencies charge for

Register for free access to our quarterly benchmark reports, the growth audit template we run on every new client, and the Margin Memo newsletter.