Scale. Optimize. Succeed.

Home  ›  Resources  ›  Statistics

eCommerce Statistics, With the Source Attached to Every Number

Most eCommerce statistics pages are a list of numbers copied from another list of numbers, with no source, no year and no indication of what was measured. Every figure here names its original source, when it was published, and the geography or sample behind it — because a statistic you cannot check is not evidence, it is decoration.

FIGURES

23 figures

SOURCES

9 primary sources

LAST REVIEWED

September 2026

NEXT REVIEW

March 2027

Printed performance charts and a laptop used to review eCommerce market data

Every number on this page links to the organisation that produced it.

What has to be true before a number appears here

Four conditions. A figure that fails any of them is left out, however useful it would have been.

Working through figures in a notebook with a calculator

A statistic without its method is an opinion with a decimal point.

The rule we apply is simple: if a journalist, analyst or client could not verify the number from what is on the page, it does not belong on the page. That removes most of what circulates as eCommerce statistics, which is why this list is shorter than the ones that promise a hundred.

Where a figure is older than we would like — the mobile share below is from 2024 — we say so rather than presenting it as current.

How large online retail actually is

The most quoted numbers in eCommerce, taken from the government statistics office that produces them rather than from a secondary summary.

$340.2bn

in US retail e-commerce sales in a single quarter, seasonally adjusted.

SOURCE

Released 18 August 2026 · United States · Q2 2026 · seasonally adjusted

17.1%

of all US retail sales were made online in the second quarter of 2026.

SOURCE

Released 18 August 2026 · United States · Q2 2026 · share of total retail

12.2%

year-on-year growth in US e-commerce, against 6.7% for total retail. Online is still taking share.

SOURCE

Released 18 August 2026 · United States · Q2 2026 vs Q2 2025 · ±0.9% at 90% confidence

3.8%

quarter-on-quarter growth in US e-commerce sales, adjusted.

SOURCE

Released 18 August 2026 · United States · Q2 2026 vs Q1 2026 · ±0.4% at 90% confidence

Why the share of retail figure depends on where you ask

The US and Great Britain publish online share figures that differ by eleven percentage points. Almost all of that gap is definitional rather than behavioural.

28.3%

of total retail sales in Great Britain were made online in July 2026 — a very different figure from the US, for definitional reasons explained below.

SOURCE

Office for National Statistics, Retail sales, Great Britain: July 2026

Released 21 August 2026 · Great Britain · July 2026 · share of retail sales by value

29.2%

was the equivalent figure a month earlier. Online share moves month to month, which is why a single month is a weak headline.

SOURCE

Office for National Statistics, Retail sales, Great Britain: July 2026

Released 21 August 2026 · Great Britain · June 2026 · share of retail sales by value

6.5%

year-on-year growth in the value of online spending in Great Britain.

SOURCE

Office for National Statistics, Retail sales, Great Britain: July 2026

Released 21 August 2026 · Great Britain · July 2026 vs July 2025 · value, not volume

Why two official figures disagree

Before quoting an online share figure, check which of these you are quoting.

Question

U.S. Census Bureau

ONS (Great Britain)

Headline figure

17.1% of retail sales

28.3% of retail sales

Period

Q2 2026

July 2026

Geography

United States

Great Britain, excluding Northern Ireland

What counts as retail

Retail trade as defined by the Census Bureau

Retail sales as defined by the ONS, including a different mix

Seasonal adjustment

Adjusted for season and trading days

Headline proportion published monthly

Measures

Sales value

Sales value

Safe to compare directly?

No

No

Both are correct. They answer slightly different questions, which is why any article presenting one as the global eCommerce share is wrong before it starts.

Device, conversion and the arrival of AI referrals

Three different measurement approaches: platform data, aggregated trading data and analytics data. Each is labelled so you can weigh it.

66%

of global online orders were placed on a mobile device, from 78% of traffic. Mobile carries more browsing than buying.

SOURCE

Published 23 April 2024, covering Q1 2024 · Global · Q1 2024 · 1.5bn shoppers across 67 countries

64%

was the equivalent US mobile order share, from 75% of traffic.

SOURCE

Published 23 April 2024, covering Q1 2024 · United States · Q1 2024 · Salesforce platform data

2.26%

average conversion rate across UK and Irish stores on one platform, up from 1.94% a year earlier.

SOURCE

July 2026 · UK & Ireland · July 2026 · one platform’s merchant base

393%

year-on-year growth in AI-sourced traffic to US retail sites in the first quarter of 2026.

SOURCE

Published April 2026, covering Q1 2026 · United States · Q1 2026 · 1tn+ visits analysed

42%

higher conversion from AI-referred visitors than from other traffic — a reversal from a year earlier, when they converted at half the rate.

SOURCE

Published April 2026, covering Q1 2026 · United States · March 2026 · Adobe Analytics customers

37%

higher revenue per visit from AI-referred sessions than from other sources.

SOURCE

Published April 2026, covering Q1 2026 · United States · Q1 2026 · Adobe Analytics customers

Abandonment and returns

The two largest sources of revenue that looks like it arrived and did not.

70.22%

average documented cart abandonment rate, averaged across 50 separate studies.

SOURCE

Aggregate of studies 2006–2025, retrieved 2026 · Mixed geographies · studies 2006–2025 · rolling average

40%

of shoppers who abandoned cited extra costs — shipping, tax and fees — as the reason. It is the single largest stated cause.

SOURCE

Aggregate of studies 2006–2025, retrieved 2026 · United States · excludes browsing-only abandonment

18%

abandoned because the site required them to create an account.

SOURCE

Aggregate of studies 2006–2025, retrieved 2026 · United States · excludes browsing-only abandonment

19.3%

of online purchases were returned, against 15.8% across all retail.

SOURCE

Published 15 October 2025 · United States · 2025 · survey of 2,006 consumers and 358 merchants

$849.9bn

in merchandise expected to be returned across US retail in a single year.

SOURCE

Published 15 October 2025 · United States · 2025 forecast · NRF with Happy Returns

20%

abandoned because delivery was too slow — the second most cited reason after cost.

SOURCE

Aggregate of studies 2006–2025, retrieved 2026 · United States · excludes browsing-only abandonment

Cart abandonment is covered in more depth, with what to do about each stated reason, on the cart abandonment statistics page.

What the largest platforms report

Company-reported figures from regulatory filings and earnings releases, which are the only numbers in this category worth quoting.

$115.6bn

in merchant sales processed through Shopify in one quarter, up 32% year on year.

SOURCE

Released 5 August 2026 · Global · Q2 2026 · GMV, not Shopify revenue

34%

year-on-year revenue growth for Shopify itself in the same quarter, to $3.58bn.

SOURCE

Released 5 August 2026 · Global · Q2 2026 · company revenue

$200.6bn

in Amazon net sales for the quarter, up 20% year on year across all its businesses.

SOURCE

Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Q2 2026 earnings report

Released 30 July 2026 · Global · Q2 2026 · includes AWS and non-retail

26%

year-on-year growth in Amazon advertising, the fastest-growing part of the marketplace economics sellers pay into.

SOURCE

Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Q2 2026 earnings report

Released 30 July 2026 · Global · Q2 2026 · advertising services

Every source behind this page

What each organisation measured, how, and what it does not cover. If you cite a figure from this page, cite the original rather than us.

1

U.S. Census Bureau

Published: Released 18 August 2026

Method: Official government estimate from the Monthly Retail Trade Survey, seasonally adjusted for holiday and trading-day differences. Confidence intervals stated at 90%.

What it does not cover: United States only. Measures retail e-commerce, so it excludes most services and business-to-business trade. Not adjusted for price changes.

2

Office for National Statistics

Published: Released 21 August 2026

Method: Monthly Business Survey of retailers in Great Britain, reporting internet sales as a proportion of total retail sales by value.

What it does not cover: Great Britain only, and it excludes Northern Ireland. Measures retail sales value rather than order volume, and a different definition from the US figure, which is why the two are not comparable.

3

Baymard Institute

Published: Aggregate of studies 2006–2025, retrieved 2026

Method: Rolling average of 50 separate published studies, alongside their own programme of 25 rounds of usability testing across 4,400+ participant sessions and 12 quantitative studies totalling 20,240 participants.

What it does not cover: An average across studies with different definitions of a cart and different sectors. Treat it as an order of magnitude, not as a target for your own store.

4

Adobe Analytics

Published: Published April 2026, covering Q1 2026

Method: Analysis of more than one trillion visits to US retail sites and more than 100 million SKUs, plus a survey of 5,000+ US respondents in March 2026.

What it does not cover: US retail sites using Adobe Analytics, so it skews toward larger retailers. AI-referred traffic is still a small share of total traffic despite the growth rate.

5

Salesforce

Published: Published 23 April 2024, covering Q1 2024

Method: Activity of more than 1.5 billion unique global shoppers across 67 countries, drawn from Salesforce Commerce, Marketing and Service Cloud data.

What it does not cover: The oldest figure on this page, and due for replacement at the next review. Covers merchants on Salesforce platforms rather than the whole market.

6

IRP Commerce

Published: July 2026

Method: Aggregated operational trading data recorded within the IRP platform, using consistent attribution across the merchant network rather than survey responses.

What it does not cover: UK and Ireland, and one platform’s merchant base. Conversion rate varies enormously by sector, price point and traffic mix, so this is context rather than a benchmark.

7

National Retail Federation and Happy Returns

Published: Published 15 October 2025

Method: Two surveys: 2,006 US consumers who had returned an online purchase in the previous twelve months, and 358 eCommerce professionals at US merchants above $500 million in revenue.

What it does not cover: United States. Return rates vary so widely by category that the headline figure tells you little about apparel or furniture specifically.

8

Shopify Inc.

Published: Released 5 August 2026

Method: Audited company reporting filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

What it does not cover: One platform. GMV is merchant sales processed through Shopify, not Shopify’s own revenue, and the two are frequently confused in secondary reporting.

9

Amazon.com, Inc.

Published: Released 30 July 2026

Method: Company quarterly reporting.

What it does not cover: Net sales include AWS and other non-retail businesses, so this is not a marketplace-only figure. Amazon did not disclose a third-party unit share in this release.

Link to the original source in your own work. We would rather be useful than credited.

How this page is maintained

Statistics pages rot faster than any other kind of content. This is the process that keeps this one honest.

Where figures come from

Review schedule

What we will not publish

Corrections

Found a number here that has moved on? Tell us and we will check it against the original.

Statistics by subject

Deeper cuts, each built to the same citation standard. Pages in production are named but not linked.

Hands on a laptop showing an online shopping basket

Published

The abandonment rate, every stated reason with its share, and what each one actually costs to fix.

Person shopping online with a laptop and payment card

In production

Shopify Statistics

Merchant GMV, revenue and growth from company filings, with the distinction between GMV and revenue made explicit.

In production — not yet published

Cardboard shipping boxes stacked in a delivery van

In production

Amazon Seller Statistics

Marketplace scale, advertising growth and seller economics, from Amazon reporting rather than from aggregators.

In production — not yet published

Smartphone used for mobile shopping

In production

Mobile Commerce Statistics

Device share of traffic and orders, and why the gap between the two is the interesting part.

In production — not yet published

Online checkout screen showing payment details and cart

In production

Conversion Rate Statistics

What published conversion benchmarks can and cannot tell you about your own store.

In production — not yet published

Rails of colourful garments in a fashion boutique

In production

Fashion eCommerce Statistics

Category-specific figures, where returns rates make the headline numbers misleading.

In production — not yet published

Need a sourced figure we have not published? Ask us and we will find it or tell you it does not exist.

About these statistics

What people ask before quoting a figure from this page.

Yes, and please cite the original source rather than us. Every figure links to the organisation that produced it, and that link is what makes the claim checkable for your own readers. If it helps to mention where you found it, a link back is welcome but not required.

Because each one has to survive the sourcing standard. Pages promising a hundred statistics are almost always recycling secondary summaries, and a large share of those numbers trace back to nothing at all when you follow them. We would rather publish fewer figures you can stand behind.

Definition, mostly. The two statistics offices define retail differently, cover different geographies and apply different adjustments. The comparison table above sets the two side by side. Quoting either as the global eCommerce share is a mistake.

Fully reviewed twice a year, in March and September, with quarterly figures checked as each new quarter is published. The last review and the next are stated at the top of the page so you can judge for yourself whether it is current.

The mobile share figure is from 2024 and is labelled as the oldest on the page. Where a better source exists we replace it at review; where it does not, we keep the figure and keep the date visible rather than implying it is current.

No. Our engagement data appears in case studies, clearly labelled as our own results, and it is never presented as an industry benchmark. Those are different claims and mixing them is how most agency statistics pages lose credibility.

We have deliberately not published one. The widely quoted global totals come from commercial forecasting houses whose methodology sits behind a paywall, which fails the standard on this page. If you need one for a board paper, buy the report rather than citing a blog.

Sometimes. Category-level data is thinner and more often proprietary. A free eCommerce audit compares your own numbers against what we see across our client base, which for most decisions is more useful than a published average anyway.

Benchmarks are context. Your own numbers are the decision.

A free eCommerce audit puts your actual conversion rate, abandonment, returns and channel mix against what we see across the accounts we run, and tells you which gap is worth closing first.